<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nodalpoint.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>nodalpoint.org - Internet played a key role in decoding SARS genome - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.nodalpoint.org/node/856</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Internet played a key role in decoding SARS genome&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Suspected and probabal cases of SARS</title>
 <link>http://www.nodalpoint.org/node/856#comment-640</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;From the WHO: &lt;a href=&quot;http://content.nejm.org/early_release/SARS.jpg&quot;&gt;http://content.nejm.org/early_release/SARS.jpg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A SARS weblog ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sarswatch.org/&quot;&gt;http://www.sarswatch.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2003 03:40:42 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 640 at http://www.nodalpoint.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SARS epidemiological study</title>
 <link>http://www.nodalpoint.org/node/856#comment-636</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In The Scientist today:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030507/05&quot;&gt;Epidemiological study&lt;/a&gt; published today gives more accurate picture than previous WHO figures&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some important points :&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;The death rate from SARS in Hong Kong is 43% in those over 60 years old (35&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2003 11:34:45 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PedroBeltrao</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 636 at http://www.nodalpoint.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Rush out those analyses</title>
 <link>http://www.nodalpoint.org/node/856#comment-635</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As I mentioned briefly already, these guys work fast.  I had a look at the SARS genome when it came out, with a vague notion that anyone with some bioinformatics skill could contribute something useful.  Seems a few other folk had the same idea :-)  Amazing how quickly people can work when something is hyped/important (take your pick).  I still fail to see how the genome will aid in the search for vaccines if the thing is similar to the common cold, perhaps someone can help me with this piece of logic.  Which is not to say the genome is of no use, genomes are just A Good Thing.&lt;br /&gt;
These analyses are well worth looking at; they range from very good to quite amateurish IMHO.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2003 20:08:42 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 635 at http://www.nodalpoint.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Internet played a key role in decoding SARS genome</title>
 <link>http://www.nodalpoint.org/node/856</link>
 <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;The Internet has had a profound impact on how this data has been shared and how scientists have collaborated.&quot; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Firstly my sympathies to those effected by the SARS virus, however for those more bioinformatically inclined the following links maybe of interest (click read more for the links):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nodalpoint.org/node/856&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nodalpoint.org/node/856#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nodalpoint.org/science/bioinformatics">Bioinformatics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nodalpoint.org/science/research">Research</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nodalpoint.org/science/virology">Virology</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2003 21:23:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">856 at http://www.nodalpoint.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
