<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nodalpoint.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>nodalpoint.org - How the Scientific Publishing Industry Began to Eat Itself - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.nodalpoint.org/2007/10/17/how_the_scientific_publishing_industry_began_to_eat_itself</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;How the Scientific Publishing Industry Began to Eat Itself&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>How the Scientific Publishing Industry Began to Eat Itself</title>
 <link>http://www.nodalpoint.org/2007/10/17/how_the_scientific_publishing_industry_began_to_eat_itself</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Greg Tyrell &lt;a href=&quot;http://nodalpoint.org/2007/08/26/if_you_publish_in_oa_journals_youre_publishing_communism&quot;&gt;recently remarked&lt;/a&gt; that there was no point in defending open-access publishing because its triumph is a foregone conclusion. I agree with him. However, for the younger guys out there, it may not be obvious why subscription science magazines is going the way of the Dodo. So I would like to offer &lt;a href=&quot;http://boscoh.com/science/how-the-scientific-publishing-industry-began-to-eat-itself&quot;&gt;some history&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nodalpoint.org/2007/10/17/how_the_scientific_publishing_industry_began_to_eat_itself#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nodalpoint.org/master_list/oss">OSS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nodalpoint.org/nodalpoint_tags/publishing_history_science">publishing history science</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:44:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bosco</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2304 at http://www.nodalpoint.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
