<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nodalpoint.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>nodalpoint.org - Nodalpoint makes top 50 - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.nodalpoint.org/2006/07/05/nodalpoint_makes_top_50</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Nodalpoint makes top 50&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Rankers</title>
 <link>http://www.nodalpoint.org/2006/07/05/nodalpoint_makes_top_50#comment-3149</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think the Nature round-up was interesting, not least because they cited my blog in the non-scientists&#039; science blogs. But, the point about ranking and rating is that they asked Technorati to pull out the top science blogs based on Technorati rank. As far as I can tell this is an even more ephemeral measure of worth than Google Pagerank, based as it is on the number of sites/blogs that are linking to a particular blog and some mystery factor, factored in over a given 60-day period. I&#039;m sure that mystery factor is there simply to obfuscate the real ranking method in the mistaken belief that black hatters won&#039;t be able to manipulate it easily.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/index.php&quot;&gt;David Bradley Science Writer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:20:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sciencebase</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3149 at http://www.nodalpoint.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Well deserved</title>
 <link>http://www.nodalpoint.org/2006/07/05/nodalpoint_makes_top_50#comment-3106</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I have already made an idiot of myself complaining about there being too much politics in the top 50 science blogs, but in my book nodalpoint is one of the best ones out there.  Keep it up&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:39:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mndoci</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3106 at http://www.nodalpoint.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>And a big thank you to</title>
 <link>http://www.nodalpoint.org/2006/07/05/nodalpoint_makes_top_50#comment-3105</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;And a big thank you to everyone that has contributed to the site. Well done !!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:10:53 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3105 at http://www.nodalpoint.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>technorati</title>
 <link>http://www.nodalpoint.org/2006/07/05/nodalpoint_makes_top_50#comment-3097</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;yes, it is.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 05:13:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>alf</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3097 at http://www.nodalpoint.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ok, not tags</title>
 <link>http://www.nodalpoint.org/2006/07/05/nodalpoint_makes_top_50#comment-3096</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, tags wasn&#039;t the word I was looking for, but it&#039;s the one that came out early this morning before sufficient caffeine :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s Technorati-derived though, right?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 09:32:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3096 at http://www.nodalpoint.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ranking</title>
 <link>http://www.nodalpoint.org/2006/07/05/nodalpoint_makes_top_50#comment-3095</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t think the ranking has anything to do with tags (Technorati or otherwise). It&#039;s more to do with the number of inbound links, and perhaps the rank of those inbound links (like PageRank) as well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 05:37:43 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>alf</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3095 at http://www.nodalpoint.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Blog ranking</title>
 <link>http://www.nodalpoint.org/2006/07/05/nodalpoint_makes_top_50#comment-3094</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;To be fair, the list title is &quot;50 popular science blogs&quot; rather than top 50 and the article points out that blog ranking is subjective.  I don&#039;t rate use of Technorati tags very highly at all as a rank measure.  But then, what&#039;s better?  I know from my own server log that traffic is an equally bad measure, with the many hits from crawlers, bots and so on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That said - yay!  The Nodal founders and community can be justly pleased and proud.  A few weeks ago I found a blog post describing Nodalpoint as &quot;the grandaddy of bioinformatics blogs&quot; (or something to that effect), which made me (a) smile and (b) realise just how long we&#039;ve been at this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 19:57:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3094 at http://www.nodalpoint.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nodalpoint makes top 50</title>
 <link>http://www.nodalpoint.org/2006/07/05/nodalpoint_makes_top_50</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060703/multimedia/50_science_blogs.html&quot;&gt;list&lt;/a&gt; of the top 50 science blogs is on Nature&#039;s news site, as part of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060703/full/442009a.html&quot;&gt;an article&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href=&quot;http://declanbutler.info/blog/&quot;&gt;Declan Butler&lt;/a&gt; highlighting the best science writing. We didn&#039;t get to interview, but we are proudly there at #46...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well done, Greg!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nodalpoint.org/2006/07/05/nodalpoint_makes_top_50#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nodalpoint.org/master_list/bioinformatics">Bioinformatics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 18:27:11 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1854 at http://www.nodalpoint.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
