http://www.nodalpoint.org/2006/06/27/worst_paper_of_the_month Comments for "worst paper of the month?" en http://www.nodalpoint.org/2006/06/27/worst_paper_of_the_month#comment-3090 <p>Our previous effort was just called "paper of the month". Nobody said that it had to be good :) So I'm not sure we need "best" or "worst", really anything that catches your eye is acceptable.</p> <br class="clear" /> Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:02:09 -0400 Neil comment 3090 at http://www.nodalpoint.org http://www.nodalpoint.org/2006/06/27/worst_paper_of_the_month <p>Hi, how about a regular entry: worst paper of the month?? That would be more fun than "best paper of the month" (as it is usually easier to criticize than to praise research, hehe...) </p> <p>My best paper at the moment is this: <a href="http://www.nodalpoint.org/2006/04/15/algorithms_algorithms_everywhere_0#comment-3089" title="http://www.nodalpoint.org/2006/04/15/algorithms_algorithms_everywhere_0#comment-3089">http://www.nodalpoint.org/2006/04/15/algorithms_algorithms_everywhere_0#...</a> Can you challenge it? (No, Katoh/Katoh papers don't count.)</p> <br class="clear" /> http://www.nodalpoint.org/2006/06/27/worst_paper_of_the_month#comments Bioinformatics Tue, 27 Jun 2006 09:59:08 -0400 maximilianh 1850 at http://www.nodalpoint.org