http://www.nodalpoint.org/2006/02/14/why_are_some_papers_considered_classics Comments for "Why are some papers considered classics?" en http://www.nodalpoint.org/2006/02/14/why_are_some_papers_considered_classics <p>One answer may be because they are very highly cited by other authors. <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0305150">But why are they cited by other authors</a>? </p> <p>Via <a href="http://www.citeulike.org/">CiteUlike</a></p> <br class="clear" /> http://www.nodalpoint.org/2006/02/14/why_are_some_papers_considered_classics#comments Bioinformatics Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:31:51 -0500 chris 1789 at http://www.nodalpoint.org