<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nodalpoint.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>nodalpoint.org - A Procedure for Assessing GO Annotation Consistency - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.nodalpoint.org/node/1660</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;A Procedure for Assessing GO Annotation Consistency&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>A Procedure for Assessing GO Annotation Consistency</title>
 <link>http://www.nodalpoint.org/node/1660</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So now I&#039;m way at the back of the main conference all because my laptop battery is not what it used to be...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Annotations are made by different annotation groups&lt;br /&gt;
- How do you maintain consistency&lt;br /&gt;
- GO aims to maintain consistency&lt;br /&gt;
- Standards, best practice, training&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- After the annotations how do we check the consistency ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Compare annotations (curated orthologs) across species ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Measure of annotation consistency: e.g. Mouse, human and rat annotation of PAX8, how do they compare ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Collect data, cluster annotations and make comparison&lt;br /&gt;
- Use curated ortholog sets from MGI about 15000&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nodalpoint.org/node/1660&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nodalpoint.org/node/1660#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nodalpoint.org/master_list/bioinformatics">Bioinformatics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nodalpoint.org/ismb2005">ISMB2005</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2005 10:52:44 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1660 at http://www.nodalpoint.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
