<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nodalpoint.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>nodalpoint.org - Sweave - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.nodalpoint.org/node/1475</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Sweave&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Sweave</title>
 <link>http://www.nodalpoint.org/node/1475</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~leisch/Sweave/FAQ.html&quot;&gt;Sweave&lt;/a&gt; is an implementation of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~nr/noweb/&quot;&gt;noweb standard&lt;/a&gt; for generating dynamic reports of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.r-project.org/&quot;&gt;R&lt;/a&gt;/S+ analyses in &lt;a&gt;Latex&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Part of an ongoing groundswell of literate programming, i.e. the preparation of code for human readers. What appeals to me is the notion that the most succinct way of describing an analysis is to produce the code itself -- albeit a clean version -- along with pretty output. Important features are the dynamic, pipe-lined aspect of the process, and the latex format, which can easily be translated to html, xml, troff, ps, rtf, and (shock, horror) MSWord.doc formats, with greater or lesser success.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nodalpoint.org/node/1475&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nodalpoint.org/node/1475#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nodalpoint.org/master_list/bioinformatics">Bioinformatics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nodalpoint.org/master_list/oss">OSS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nodalpoint.org/bioinformatics/open_source_software">Open source software</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2003 05:59:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1475 at http://www.nodalpoint.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
