archives

Date
  • 01
  • 02
  • 03
  • 04
  • 05
  • 06
  • 07
  • 08
  • 09
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31

High-throughput pyro-sequencers for the price of a PCR machine in three years

I knew that sequencers are getting cheaper all the time but in genome technology this week they're talking with the inventors of the technology that 454 is licencing, discussing future pyro-sequencing updates and how that should lead to very cheap machines. Prospects are that any lab can sequence it's own genome in three years, the technology seems almost ready: Basically a cheaper and smaller version of 454's current machines. If you believe that sequence databases are exploding at the moment, better prepare for a new wave.


Real-world workshops: Regcreative

I've recently been to a cool workshop called "RegCreative". The idea was to mass-curate papers into a new database. There we have the usual discussion "open" (Oreganno) versus "private" (Transfac) databases and the open one is this case is still far from big enough, but that's not my main point here.
I liked the workshop because we were actually spending a lot of time at the computer and reading papers. There were no big stars, impressive results, great publications and hypothesizes, mainly people that presented their own databases ("I've spent 500 hours to create my database" (flytf), "I read 120 papers) (flyreg), etc...) and then afterwards everyone would get back to their computers, trying to put in one of the papers from the big pile at the entrace. The problem of database curation became very obvious to all participants and they got more tired of reading papers with every day that passed... (Here is a picture from the beginning, when people were still discussing :-)


Life-Science data standards

The full complement of the Human Proteome Organisation (HUPO) Proteomics Standards Initiative (PSI), Minimum Information About a Proteomics Experiment (MIAPE), recommended reporting guidelines are now available for community review on the Nature Biotechnology website.

The manuscripts range from the definition of the MIAPE concept to the individual guidelines themselves which cover, Mass Spectrometry, Mass Spectrometry Informatics, Gel Electrophoresis and Molecular Interaction experiments. A further paper on the PSI protein modification ontology (PSI-MOD) is also listed.