archives

Date
  • 01
  • 02
  • 03
  • 04
  • 05
  • 06
  • 07
  • 08
  • 09
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30

Algorithms, algorithms everywhere...

There are indeed quite a few multiple alignment algorithms. Wallace et al counted around 50. They started drawing trees of alignment algorithms.

Has anyone collected a list of all papers that developed a new alignment algorithm (each one, of course, better than a couple of the others)? I personally would bet that - given that the number of algorithms raise with algorithmical simplicity and the interpretability of the results - motif discovery on DNA is one of the disciplines that generated the most different papers about a new algorithm (counted around 80). Fortunately, the decision is much simpler as the savvy bio-computerfreak knows: With so much choice, the first program that gently compiles after "make" has a good chance of getting used in the end. Is this the reason why everyone is using BLAST today? Or was that a completely different time?