Hi, how about a regular entry: worst paper of the month?? That would be more fun than "best paper of the month" (as it is usually easier to criticize than to praise research, hehe...)
My best paper at the moment is this: http://www.nodalpoint.org/2006/04/15/algorithms_algorithms_everywhere_0#... Can you challenge it? (No, Katoh/Katoh papers don't count.)
"paper of the month"
Our previous effort was just called "paper of the month". Nobody said that it had to be good :) So I'm not sure we need "best" or "worst", really anything that catches your eye is acceptable.